Previous Page  50 / 60 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 50 / 60 Next Page
Page Background

effective alternative. This approach enables operators to meet

shifting production demands and avoid lengthy downtime in a

cost-effective manner, while extending the life of the valves.

Far from being a second-rate solution, when a retrofit is

handled well, it can enable a cryogenic valve to perform better

than ever. With the addition of an innovative, customised trim,

existing valves can handle larger volumes with ease. What is

more, valve engineers have the benefit of insight into real

production challenges that may not have been apparent at the

original point of specification. In addition to this, if the valves

have been in service for a long time, modern technologies and

manufacturing techniques could offer new ways to enhance

their performance.

Testing and ongoing management

While there is no dedicated industry standard for valves

destined for cryogenic LNG applications, it is necessary to

test any control valve handling hazardous substances for seat

leakage. This is generally done in accordance with industry

standards BS 6364, ASME B16.34 and ANSI FCI 70-2, under

cryogenic conditions specified by the end-user. It is regular

practice for cryogenic valves to undergo testing at temperatures

of -196°C to verify that they can perform reliably at supercool

temperatures beyond what they are expected to encounter.

Typically, at least one cryogenic valve of each type per LNG

train or system undergoes cryogenic testing. In some cases, all

severe and critical service cryogenic valves are tested

individually.

Once a test specimen has passed standard hydrostatic and

seat leakage assessments at ambient temperature, it is purged

of previous test fluids before submersion in a tank of liquid

nitrogen. When it reaches the test temperature, it is filled with

helium gas (which does not freeze or liquefy at -196°C) and

carefully assessed for any seat or pressure shell leakage.

Thorough cryogenic testing reduces the likelihood of

having to troubleshoot during plant startup and provides a

high level of quality assurance for the end-user. Ideally,

in-factory tests should go one step further, in order to facilitate

proactive lifetime management of cryogenic valves. In addition

to the regulatory testing, establishing each valve’s performance

footprint provides a valuable benchmark for future performance

data throughout its life. This enables plant managers to quickly

ascertain whether set criteria are being met, and ensures the

rapid identification of any deviation from standard

performance, so that intervention can take place in a timely

and effective manner.

The hidden strength of

customisation

Cryogenic valves can be an LNG plant’s Achilles heel or hidden

strength. As production volumes increase to meet rising

global demand, there is an acute need to focus on maximising

their safe and reliable performance. Cryogenic valves with a

customised design may result in higher upfront CAPEX than

off-the-shelf products, but the OPEX benefits more than

compensate.

Applying specialist engineering skill to valve design

mitigates risk and maximises reliability. Combining this with

robust cryogenic testing and performance benchmarks ensures

cryogenic valves are primed for enduring good performance. In

the context of an LNG facility, cryogenic valves are a relatively

small piece of equipment, but they can make a big difference to

productivity. Customising them to deliver optimum performance

offers a route to commercial advantage.

LNG Industry magazine

Register for your free subscription at:

www.lngindustry.com

Global coverage

of the entire LNG

value chain